Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to remove the ability to "forum store" by excluding a debtor's location of incorporation from the place analysis, andalarming to global debtorsexcluding cash or cash equivalents from the "principal properties" formula. In addition, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed situated in the exact same place as the principal.
Generally, this statement has been concentrated on controversial 3rd party release arrangements executed in recent mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Young Boy Scouts of America, and numerous Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These arrangements frequently require lenders to release non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's strategy of reorganization, although such releases are perhaps not allowed, a minimum of in some circuits, by the Bankruptcy Code.
Choosing Between Bankruptcy and Debt Settlement ProgramsIn effort to stamp out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to restrict "forum shopping" by restricting entities from filing in any place except where their home office or primary physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare located. Ostensibly, these bills would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other United States districts, and steer cases far from the preferred courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Despite their admirable function, these proposed amendments might have unanticipated and possibly negative consequences when viewed from an international restructuring prospective. While congressional testimony and other analysts assume that place reform would merely make sure that domestic companies would submit in a various jurisdiction within the US, it is a distinct possibility that global debtors may hand down the United States Bankruptcy Courts completely.
Without the factor to consider of money accounts as an avenue towards eligibility, numerous foreign corporations without concrete properties in the United States may not certify to file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, international debtors may not be able to count on access to the usual and hassle-free reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Provided the intricate concerns often at play in a global restructuring case, this may cause the debtor and lenders some uncertainty. This unpredictability, in turn, might encourage global debtors to submit in their own countries, or in other more advantageous nations, instead. Notably, this proposed place reform comes at a time when numerous nations are emulating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which emphasized liquidation, the new Code's goal is to reorganize and protect the entity as a going issue. Hence, financial obligation restructuring agreements might be authorized with as little as 30 percent approval from the overall debt. Unlike the US, Italy's new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by financial institutions.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the country's approval of 3rd party release arrangements. In Canada, businesses generally reorganize under the standard insolvency statutes of the Business' Financial Institutions Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile hotly objected to in the USare a typical element of restructuring plans.
The recent court choice makes clear, though, that despite the CBCA's more restricted nature, 3rd party release arrangements might still be acceptable. Therefore, companies might still get themselves of a less troublesome restructuring offered under the CBCA, while still getting the benefits of 3rd celebration releases. Reliable as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act on Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has created a debtor-in-possession procedure carried out beyond official personal bankruptcy procedures.
Efficient since January 1, 2021, Germany's new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Businesses provides for pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German business had no option to reorganize their debts through the courts. Now, distressed business can hire German courts to restructure their debts and otherwise protect the going concern worth of their business by utilizing a lot of the very same tools offered in the US, such as keeping control of their business, enforcing cram down restructuring strategies, and carrying out collection moratoriums.
Motivated by Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, this new structure simplifies the debtor-in-possession restructuring process largely in effort to help small and medium sized organizations. While previous law was long criticized as too costly and too complicated because of its "one size fits all" method, this new legislation integrates the debtor in ownership design, and attends to a streamlined liquidation procedure when necessary In June 2020, the United Kingdom enacted the Business Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA attends to a collection moratorium, invalidates specific arrangements of pre-insolvency agreements, and allows entities to propose an arrangement with investors and financial institutions, all of which allows the development of a cram-down strategy similar to what might be accomplished under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made significant legal modifications to the restructuring provisions of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has significantly boosted the restructuring tools readily available in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In Might of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Personal Bankruptcy Code, which entirely overhauled the insolvency laws in India. This legislation seeks to incentivize further financial investment in the nation by supplying higher certainty and efficiency to the restructuring procedure.
Provided these current modifications, worldwide debtors now have more choices than ever. Even without the proposed restrictions on eligibility, foreign entities might less need to flock to the US as before. Further, need to the United States' place laws be amended to prevent easy filings in specific practical and useful venues, worldwide debtors may begin to consider other areas.
Unique thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this content under the supervision of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles office.
Commercial filings leapt 49% year-over-year the highest January level considering that 2018. The numbers show what debt experts call "slow-burn monetary pressure" that's been building for years.
Customer insolvency filings totaled 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Commercial filings struck 1,378 a 49% year-over-year dive and the greatest January industrial filing level considering that 2018. For all of 2025, customer filings grew almost 14%.
Latest Posts
Reducing Your Unsecured Debt With Settlement Services
Proven Ways to Avoid Bankruptcy in 2026
How to Lower Card Rates Legally


